BGO Discussion Forum

http://www.examiner.com/x-2782-DC-Gun-Rights-Examiner~y2009m11d11-DA-says-Pittsburgh-airport-gun-ban-not-enforceable

Alaska resident David Ross' flight into Pittsburgh Airport for a short visit to the Keystone State last July 1st was uneventful - until, that is, he was arrested for retrieving his sidearm from checked baggage and holstering up on the way out of the airport.
Mr. Ross told the Examiner.com that he tried to explain to Magistrate Judge Anthony Saveikis that Allegheny County's ordinance banning gun carry at the airport was "preempted by Section 6120 of the Pennsylvania Uniform Firearms Act," but Saveikis found him guilty anyway. Ross then hired Pennsylvania attorney J. Michael McCormick to appeal his conviction to the court of common pleas.
After Mr. McCormick filed this briefing with the court, the District Attorney's office for Allegheny County conceded that the County's ordinance was not legally enforceable. As a result, Judge Robert C. Gallo entered a judgment of "not guilty" in the case according to court records.
John Pierce, co-founder of OpenCarry.org maintains a map of state by state airport gun carry laws and says that Pennsylvania is "just like most states" which allow gun carry in the non-sterile areas of airports just like they do in shopping malls, parks, and most other public venues. But what irks gun rights organizers the most about this case is that public officials should already know that state law preempts local gun bans because the Pennsylvania Supreme Court settled that issue a decade ago in Ortiz v. Commonwealth.
"This should never have been an issue to begin with," said Rich Banks, founder of PAOpenCarry.org, a Pennsylvania gun rights group, referring to open carry at the airport which requires no license in Pennsylvania and most states. Banks contends that Pennsylvania public officials too often "treat guns like they are an 'exception' to the rule of law" and that the Allegheny County Council should now move quickly to repeal what Banks said is "an illegal gun ban ordinance."

Sheesh, you'd think the Judge would know the law. It's no wonder our legal system is in such a disarray.

It happens more often than you think. There was an issue in the county where I live (Franklin) that a man open carried to a polling place a couple of years ago and had his CC license revoked. Problem #1-There is no law in this county that does not allow guns in a polling place unless it is held in a goverment building which there no polls at any goverment building .

Problem #2 There was law enforcement at the polling place-This is not allowed to happen because it can give the perception of "Influence". Of course an appeal was quickly issued The local gun rights organization as well as Open Carry.org got involved and not only was the gentleman re-issued his CC license, the Sheriff was repremanded too.(I believe he was voted out also)

However the Appeals Judge did say while the accused didn't break any laws, he felt that weapons was should not be allowed in polling places and that those who agree should write their local politician to have the law "adjusted" during voting days.

It's truly a sad state of affairs out there people. Studying the law is no guarantee that we won't be hasseled by the very peolple who should uphold our laws.